Induced
hypothermia (lowering the body temperature to ≤35°C) attenuates
neuronal damage and provides neuroprotection mainly through lowering the
rate of metabolism. It thus finds applications in ameliorating the
secondary damage associated with traumatic brain injury, cardiac arrest,
and stroke. This article will focus on therapeutic hypothermia after
cardiac arrest.
Advantages of Hypothermia
For
each degree centigrade decrease in body temperature, cellular
metabolism is reduced by 5-7%, but the observed neuroprotective effect
of hypothermia is much greater than can be explained by reduced
metabolism alone [1].
During hypothermia the brain is exposed to
fewer excitatory neurotransmitters and has more time to clear free
radicals. It also reduces the average kinetic energy and hence the
velocities at which free radicals travel, effectively lowering the
likelihood that a free radical can damage vital cell parts before it
gets neutralized by the endogenous antioxidative system.
Altogether,
hypothermia induces a favorable shift in intracellular concentrations
of ions and metabolites such as inorganic phosphate, lactic acid, Ca2+ and H+, hence slowing brain acidosis [1].
Hypothermia Studies
Animal
studies of therapeutic hypothermia have shown profound neuroprotective
effects [1]. Despite being the most used model, the small rodent brain
is structurally, dimensionally, and metabolically different from the
proportionally bigger and complex human brain. Therefore, it probably
shows a greater response to neuroprotective efforts. Unlike with rodent
models human studies must take into consideration different
temperatures, duration of therapy, therapy onset/ending, cooling
methods, and factors such as age, gender, and pre-existing illness
[1,2]. Clinical studies of hypothermia after cardiac arrest have
therefore produced strongly inconsistent results.
The two largest
recent controlled studies on humans have shown significant improvements
in patients’ neurological outcome and survival. The European study on
“Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after
cardiac arrest” showed a reduction in mortality by 14% and a 16%
increase in patients with a good neurological outcome (able to live
independently ½ year after cardiac arrest) in the hypothermia group. The
2002 Australian study on “Treatment of Comatose Survivors of
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Induced Hypothermia” demonstrated a
26% increase in patients with a good neurological outcome [1,3].
Cooling Methods
Cooling
must be accompanied by the use of sedatives and neuromuscular blockers,
otherwise treatment will cause shivering and hence re-warming of the
body with a counterproductive increase in energy/oxygen consumption. A
good treatment protocol and adequate monitoring is required to
successfully apply hypothermia.
Many adequate cooling methods are
available and, with advancing medical technology, even more have become
available. One such new device is an intravascular heat exchanger [3],
which allows for rapid cooling and exact monitoring of blood flow and
temperature. Another new internal cooling method is the intravenous
infusion of iced isotonic fluid, such as saline solution [2,3]. Because
saline solution is readily available even in a pre-hospital setting and
safe to use regardless of age or gender, this is a suitable candidate
for the early initiation of hypothermia. It is nevertheless necessary to
maintain the cooled state with other methods later [2,3].
External
methods include the application of ice packs to areas with a high heat
exchange capability like the armpits, neck, groin or the head in the
form of a cooling helmet [3,4]. However, proper placing of these devices
requires a breach of privacy, especially when carried out in a
pre-hospital setting. In addition the rate of cooling is relatively
slow. Alternative methods include the use of cooling blankets or
wet-evaporative cooling [4].
Hypothermia should be initiated as
soon as safely possible but homeostatic imbalances induced by ischemia
and the physical insult of reperfusion will persist for days. Hence
there is a long time window (48-72h) to initiate and maintain
hypothermia. Any one cooling method alone has shown lower efficacy than
two or more methods combined. That and the rapid invention and inclusion
of new cooling methods is one reason why an optimal therapy has not
been developed and should therefore be researched and compared across
qualified hospitals around the world.
[1] Poldermann, Intensive Care Med, 2004
[2] Peberdy et al, Circulation, 2010
[3] Nolan et al, Circulation, 2003
[4] http://bit.ly/13SyEz4
By Rick Cornell Hellmann, Alumni Medical Neurosciences, AG Spinal Cord Injury
May 29, 2017
Hyperthermia Impairs Memory Functions
On
extremely hot summer days, can we really perform our everyday tasks
with full efficiency? Can we focus our attention on what we want? Or
should we, perhaps, take at least two months off because working during
summer does not make any sense?
Once again, scientists do not disappoint us by providing research on the influence of hyperthermia on cognitive processes. In a number of studies, healthy participants were exposed to high temperatures and then tested on their cognitive abilities in comparison to control groups. The results are consistent and point to the fact that hyperthermia does indeed impair short-term memory. More specifically, it influences reaction time during visual short-term memory performance, yet does not affect the accuracy [1]. Importantly, it enhances activity in bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and right intraparietal sulcus, regions important for task performance [1]. It is speculated that these activity changes are due to the higher occupation of cognitive resources in response to hyperthermia.
In other studies, it has been shown that heat exposure impairs complicated cognitive abilities, like the aforementioned visual short-term memory. However, it does not affect performance in simple tests, like attention tests [2,3]. Moreover, the authors showed beneficial effects of head cooling during hyperthermia, which preserved memory capacity, but appeared ineffective on visual recognition tests [3].
Armed with this knowledge, you always have a good excuse when something goes wrong on a very hot day. Jumping into a lake is nothing more than improving your cognitive skills! Just remember to keep a cool head, at all times!
[1] Jiang et al, Int J Hyperthermia, 2013
[2] Gaoua et al, Int J Hyperthermia, 2011
[3] Racinais et al, J Physiol, 2008
by Filip Morys, Alumni Med Neuro
This article originally appeared 2013 in CNS Volume 6, Issue 3, Heat or Cold: What's Good for the Brain?
Image by stux via pixabay |
Once again, scientists do not disappoint us by providing research on the influence of hyperthermia on cognitive processes. In a number of studies, healthy participants were exposed to high temperatures and then tested on their cognitive abilities in comparison to control groups. The results are consistent and point to the fact that hyperthermia does indeed impair short-term memory. More specifically, it influences reaction time during visual short-term memory performance, yet does not affect the accuracy [1]. Importantly, it enhances activity in bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and right intraparietal sulcus, regions important for task performance [1]. It is speculated that these activity changes are due to the higher occupation of cognitive resources in response to hyperthermia.
In other studies, it has been shown that heat exposure impairs complicated cognitive abilities, like the aforementioned visual short-term memory. However, it does not affect performance in simple tests, like attention tests [2,3]. Moreover, the authors showed beneficial effects of head cooling during hyperthermia, which preserved memory capacity, but appeared ineffective on visual recognition tests [3].
Armed with this knowledge, you always have a good excuse when something goes wrong on a very hot day. Jumping into a lake is nothing more than improving your cognitive skills! Just remember to keep a cool head, at all times!
[1] Jiang et al, Int J Hyperthermia, 2013
[2] Gaoua et al, Int J Hyperthermia, 2011
[3] Racinais et al, J Physiol, 2008
by Filip Morys, Alumni Med Neuro
This article originally appeared 2013 in CNS Volume 6, Issue 3, Heat or Cold: What's Good for the Brain?
May 27, 2017
Laughter As An Exercise
In
modern society there is a trend: to accomplish success and peak
performance in every field of work, you should be healthy. Therefore,
many people start to work out their bodies (and unfortunately not their
souls), in gyms. After a while, they get bored. Is there an alternative
for those of who are not morally satisfied when they gaze at their
reflection in the mirror while doing bicep curls? Yes there is!
If
you have enough fun, you could be both fit and healthy! Laughing, at
the very least, is equally effective for your body as physical
exercises. Let’s explore the biological advantages of laughing to learn
more about this radical exercise program.
Nuts and Bolts
Motion,
emotion, and cognition are the three elements upon which all our
laughing, giggling, and guffawing are based. We know that laughing
increases blood pressure and heart rate, changes the way we breathe,
reduces the levels of certain neurotransmitters (catecholamines and
neuroendocrine peptides), and provides a boost to the immune system [1].
Mirthful laughing can further reduce stress and improve the activity of
natural killer cells. As low natural killer cell activity is linked to
decreased disease resistance and increased morbidity in those with
cancer or HIV, laughter might be a useful cognitive-behavioral
intervention [2].
Unlike other elements of human
behavior, laughter requires the entire body to actively participate. In
particular, laughing can help improve cardiac vagal tone. This tone
reflects the relationship between our heart rate and breathing. In
stressful situations, cardiac vagal tone indicates the "capacity" of
your body to regain calm (and presumably carry on). Regular laughter,
therefore, can improve our ability to relax. Intense "belly" laughter
exercises the diaphragm and tones the abdomen and many other core
muscles [3].
200 LAUGHS = INTENSE ROWING FOR 10 MINUTES
Sounds fantastic! What kind of other
physical activities can provide low impact exercise without special
equipment or accessories? Not to mention burning calories: Dr. William
Fry from Stanford University said in a recent interview that laughing
200 times can burn as many calories as rowing intensely for 10 minutes.
It also boosts your energy and gives you that "alive" feeling. How else
can laughter keep you fit, both mentally and physically? Perhaps you
could try Laughing Yoga, a movement that has been slowly growing
worldwide.
Serious Yoga Gets Funny
Although
adherents of this type of exercise believe that their practices are
strongly rooted in scientific evidence, not all doctors agree.
Unfortunately, the medical community is reluctant to embrace and support
laughter for health. It is claimed that the effects of humor and
laughter are nothing but a placebo effect. Laughing Yoga produces all
the psychological benefits of natural (involuntary) laughter by
voluntarily simulating laughter or by self-inducing laughter. Laughing
Yoga then combines this artificial laughter with yogic breathing as a
form of group exercise [4].
Could this truly be
effective? Well, it has been shown that aerobic laughter exercise
significantly increases positive feelings, social identification,
personal efficacy, and the morale of healthy employees in the workplace
[5]. Doubtless, there is still a lot of research to be done in the area.
At present, it is difficult to sift out the cause and effect of these
cited health benefits.
In conclusion, there is no
“magic bullet” which could save mankind from depression or lack of
physical activity. However, it appears that, with laughter, it is
possible to improve your physiological and physical state. According to
Laughing Yoga, this is “tricking” your brain-body relationship with
unconditional laughter, yoga breathing, stretching, and mental
preparation with positive thinking. Why “tricking”? At the end of the
day, our bodies don’t feel the difference between the effects of
conditional and unconditional laughs [2]. Who knows, this interesting
new undertaking might be a great alternative to boring gym classes! More
importantly, it could also be an exciting new avenue of treatment for
many chronic diseases.
[1] Berk et al, Am J Med Sci, 1989
[2] Bennett et al, Altern Ther Health Med, 2003
[3] Martin, Psychol Bul, 2001
[4] Shahidi et al, Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2011
[5] Beckman et al, J Prim Prev, 2007
by Nailya Bikmurzina, MSc MedNeuro
this article originally appeared 2015 in CNS Volume 8, Issue 1, Humor
May 25, 2017
Sprinters, Swimmers, and Bellybuttons
Which sport should you pick up this summer, running or swimming? For your decision, keep in mind that the centre of mass is key to success in speed sports.
How many gold medals would Michael Phelps have won if he had decided to be a runner instead of a swimmer? If Usain Bolt took a dip in the pool rather than a lap around the running track, would he still be a record-breaking sportsman? According to science, they probably would not be as successful had they chosen a different sport.
Professional athletes train in their respective sports for the better parts of their lives. They maintain exercise and dieting plans for years that would break many of us down in days. As a result, they develop a physical prowess that allows them to achieve incredible feats. For many people, however, choosing the wrong sport may mean that they never live up to their true athletic potential.
Genetics, which are at least partly responsible for body mass and height, play a crucial role in determining which sports athletes excel at. In fact, the reason why people of certain ethnicities do better at some sports than others may be explained by simple physics [1]. When running, locomotion is achieved as the centre of mass of the body falls forwards from a height corresponding to the distance from the centre of mass (approximately at the bellybutton in humans) to the ground. While swimming, forward locomotion is dependent on the distance from the bellybutton to the top of the head producing a lever-like mechanism oscillating about the centre of mass and generating water waves.
The location of a person’s centre of gravity affects their aptitude for speed sports. Due to their long torsos, white athletes tend to have lower centres of mass and are often successful at swimming. Black athletes on the other hand usually have high centres of mass (with long, slim limbs) and fare better at running [2].
For all you budding athletes deciding which sport to pursue, it’s always worth taking a look at your bellybutton.
[1] Charles and Bejan, J Exp Biol, 2009
[2] Bejan et al, Int Journal of Design and Nature, 2010
by Ahmed Khalil, PhD Student AG Fiebach
How many gold medals would Michael Phelps have won if he had decided to be a runner instead of a swimmer? If Usain Bolt took a dip in the pool rather than a lap around the running track, would he still be a record-breaking sportsman? According to science, they probably would not be as successful had they chosen a different sport.
By HansenHimself via pixabay |
Professional athletes train in their respective sports for the better parts of their lives. They maintain exercise and dieting plans for years that would break many of us down in days. As a result, they develop a physical prowess that allows them to achieve incredible feats. For many people, however, choosing the wrong sport may mean that they never live up to their true athletic potential.
Genetics, which are at least partly responsible for body mass and height, play a crucial role in determining which sports athletes excel at. In fact, the reason why people of certain ethnicities do better at some sports than others may be explained by simple physics [1]. When running, locomotion is achieved as the centre of mass of the body falls forwards from a height corresponding to the distance from the centre of mass (approximately at the bellybutton in humans) to the ground. While swimming, forward locomotion is dependent on the distance from the bellybutton to the top of the head producing a lever-like mechanism oscillating about the centre of mass and generating water waves.
ATHLETES, TAKE A LOOK
AT YOUR BELLYBUTTON!
The location of a person’s centre of gravity affects their aptitude for speed sports. Due to their long torsos, white athletes tend to have lower centres of mass and are often successful at swimming. Black athletes on the other hand usually have high centres of mass (with long, slim limbs) and fare better at running [2].
For all you budding athletes deciding which sport to pursue, it’s always worth taking a look at your bellybutton.
[1] Charles and Bejan, J Exp Biol, 2009
[2] Bejan et al, Int Journal of Design and Nature, 2010
by Ahmed Khalil, PhD Student AG Fiebach
May 23, 2017
Conference Report: 14th Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society 2014
In May 2014 Apoorva Rajiv Madipakkam had the opportunity to visit Florida and the annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society.
In the second week of May, vision scientists from around the world came together in Florida, for what is probably one of the largest vision science conferences: the Vision Sciences Society (VSS).
With every possible topic concerning visual perception, from attention and face perception to computational modeling and eye movements, the conference was filled with the presentation of exciting ideas and data. Workshops that included discussions on the most controversial topic in science – journal publications and impact factors – made the conference even more lively.
Apart from the daytime sessions, the evenings were also filled with interesting events like the Illusion Of The Year contest. The dynamic Ebbinghaus illusion bagged the prize for this year. The classical Ebbinghaus illusion is the apparent change in size of a central circle, depending on the context in which it is presented. That is, the central circle appears bigger when surrounded by smaller circles and smaller when surrounded by bigger circles although the actual size remains the same. The classical illusion has a new twist to it which can be checked out here: http://bit.ly/1s6cpki
Beuchet Chair, source: http://viperlibnew.york.ac.uk/ |
by Apoorva Rajiv Madipakkam, Alumni AG Sterzer
this article originally appeared 2014 in CNS Volume 7, Issue 3, Nature vs Nurture
May 20, 2017
The Dancing Brain
Neural Correlates of Dance
Dancing
is most definitely my favorite form of art. It is actually one of the
few forms that can be placed in both the categories of arts and sports
(maybe we should start calling it a ‘spart’!). Dancing beautifully
integrates complex motor learning and memory, rhythmic musical
synchronization, and creative emotional expression. As a neuroscientist
and a dancer, I feel compelled to summarize here the links between these
two fascinating fields and some interesting features of the dancing
brain.
Dance Performance
Not
surprisingly, the brain areas that are activated during dancing are
mostly the ones involved in the planning and execution of movements
(motor cortex and basal ganglia), in receiving feedback from the muscles
(somatosensory cortex), and in the fine tuning and coordination of
movements (cerebellum) [1].
Brown
and colleagues looked more deeply into which brain areas are activated
by particular aspects of dancing. They placed amateur tango dancers in a
positron emission tomography scanner while performing leg movements on a
designed apparatus. The putamen (part of the basal ganglia) was
strongly activated only when the subject danced to regular, metric
music, but not to an irregular rhythm. The cerebellum was implicated in
matching dance steps to music and the superior parietal lobule was
engaged in spatial guidance of leg motions [2].These
findings suggest that different areas of the central nervous system are
responsible for the control of specific and distinct tasks in dancing.
Source: Chris Gash |
Dance Observation
Other
neuroimaging studies observed the brain's response to visual
observation of dance. Dancers trained in either ballet or capoeira (a
Brazilian martial art) and non-dancers watched videos of both these
styles while their brains were scanned. All subjects showed activation
of brain areas involved in action observation and simulation networks –
the “mirror neuron system”.
However,
activation of these areas was stronger in dance experts and even
stronger when the dancers saw movements they had been trained to
perform, compared to watching movements they were unfamiliar with. There
was no difference in the brain activity of non-dancers while watching
ballet or capoeira [3]. This shows that even passive observation of
dance activates movement areas in the brain as if you were moving
yourself, and that dancers have an enhanced neural representation of
their personal motor repertoire.
With Practice Comes Adaptation
An
interesting study showed that the brain of ballet dancers adapts to
prevent them from feeling dizzy. Brain scans revealed that the
vestibular cerebellum, an area responsible for the perception of
dizziness, is smaller in dancers compared to non-dancers [4]. This
demonstrates that even the vestibular response is sensitive to training.
Also, skilled dancers depend less on vision for postural control
compared to non-dancers. Instead, they rely on their highly accurate
proprioception – the sense of awareness of body parts’ positions in
space [5].
DANCING INCREASES NEURAL
CONNECTIVITY
Professional
dancers are also trained with motor techniques to perform highly
demanding moves in apparently effortless ways. An electromyography study
showed that, when performing swinging leg movements, skilled ballet
dancers selectively applied minimal muscle tension at the very same
position where the sway force was maximal. This means that they learn to
optimize motor function and consequently reduce energy costs in terms
of force and muscle contraction [6].
Benefits of Dancing
Several
studies have observed better balance, posture, proprioception, and
cardio-respiratory resistance in dancers compared to non-dancers. But
don’t think you would have to become a professional to profit from these
benefits. Even short episodes of breakdance training increase balance
skills in young amateurs [7].
Dance
practice has the potential to improve not only motor, but also
cognitive skills. An impressive 21-year study showed that frequent
dancing is highly protective against dementias, such as Alzheimer’s
disease, lowering the risk as much as 76%! It was also found to be much
more beneficial than doing crossword puzzles (47% reduced risk), reading
(35%) or swimming or bicycling (0% – no difference at all) [8].
DANCERS RELY ON PROPRIOCEPTION
MORE THAN VISION
Neuroplasticity
is likely responsible for this effect. When we dance, we enrich our
brain, making split-second decisions and creating new synapses and
neural paths that become especially valuable as we age.
Dancing
is not only physically demanding, it is cognitively demanding as well.
So when you dance, you are exercising both your body and your brain.
Regular dance training makes you improve innumerable motor and cognitive
skills, contributes to brain plasticity, and enhances social
interaction. And, all health benefits aside, dancing is simply fun! How
much better can it possibly get?
[2] Brown et al, Cereb Cortex, 2006
[3] Calvo-Merino et al, Cereb Cortex, 2005
[4] Nigmatullina et al, Cereb Cortex, 2013
[5] Golomer and Dupui, Int J Neurosci, 2000
[6] Lepelley et al, Exp Brain Res, 2006
[7] Ricotti and Ravaschio, Gait Posture, 2011
[8] Verghese et al, N Engl J Med, 2003
by Mariana Cerdeira, PhD Student AG Harms
This article originally appeared 2015 in CNS Volume 8, Issue 2, Art. And the Brain.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)